ArticleArchives of disease in childhood1998
Parental and professional perception of need for emergency admission to hospital: prospective questionnaire based study.
Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised controlled trial comparing an acute paediatric hospital at home scheme with conventional hospital care.Archives of disease in childhood · 2002Trial
- Consultant-led triage of paediatric hospital referrals: a service evaluation.BMJ paediatrics open · 2021Article
- Use and Misuse of Emergency Room for Children: Features of Walk-In Consultations and Parental Motivations in a Hospital in Southern Italy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- The transition to clinical expert: enhanced decision making for children aged less than 5 years attending the paediatric ED with acute respiratory conditions.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2017Article
- Child health: general practitioners (GPs) and the care of children and young people.London journal of primary care · 2010Article
- Patterns of admissions for children with special needs to the paediatric assessment unit.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004Article
- Who should provide primary care for children?Archives of disease in childhood · 2004Article
- Profile of patients attending pediatric emergency service at Chandigarh.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2003Article
- Clinical training experience in district general hospitals.Archives of disease in childhood · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare views of parents, consultants, and general practitioners on severity of acute illness and need for admission, and to explore views on alternative services.
methodProspective questionnaire based study of 887 consecutive emergency paediatric admissions over two separate three week periods in summer and winter of five Yorkshire hospitals, combined with a further questionnaire on a subsample. OUTCOME MEASURES: Parental scores of need for admission and parent and consultant illness severity scores out of 10. Consultant judgment of need for admission. Alternatives to admission considered by consultants and, for a subsample, by parents and family GP.
resultsNinety nine per cent of parents thought admission was needed. Parents scored need for admission more highly than severity of illness with no association observed between severity and presenting problem or diagnosis. High parental need score was associated with a fit, past illness, and length of stay. Consultant illness severity scores were skewed to the lower range. Consultants considered admission necessary in 71%, especially for children aged over 1 year, presentation with breathing difficulty or fit, and after a longer stay. More admissions in the evening were considered unnecessary as were admissions after longer preadmission illness, gastroenteritis, or upper respiratory tract infection. Of a subsample of parents, 81% preferred admission during the acute stage of illness even if home nursing had been available. Similar responses were obtained from GPs. Alternative services could have avoided admission for 19% of children, saving 15.6% of bed days used.
conclusionsMedical professionals and parents differ in their views about admission for acute illnesses. More information is needed on children not admitted. Alternative services should take account of patterns of illness and should be acceptable to parents and professionals; cost savings may be marginal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.