Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9872959›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

Molecular population genetics of the rp49 gene region in different chromosomal inversions of Drosophila subobscura.

J Rozas, C Segarra, G Ribó, M Aguadé

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J RozasDepartament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08071 Barcelona, Spain. julio@porthos.bio.ub.es
C Segarra
G Ribó
M Aguadé
Universitat de Barcelona · ESCentre d’Investigació i Desenvolupament · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide variation at the ribosomal protein 49 (rp49) gene region has been studied in 75 lines of Drosophila subobscura belonging to four chromosomal arrangements (Ost, O3+4, O3+4+8, and O3+4+23). The location of the rp49 gene region within the inversion loop differs among heterokaryotypes: it is very close to one of the breakpoints in heterozygotes involving Ost chromosomes, while it is in a more central position in all other heterokaryotypes. The distribution of nucleotide polymorphism in the different arrangements is consistent with a monophyletic origin of the inversions. The data also provide evidence that gene conversion and possibly double crossover are involved in shuffling nucleotide variation among gene arrangements. The analyses reveal that the level of genetic exchange is higher when the region is located in a more central position of the inverted fragment than when it is close to the breakpoints. The pairwise difference distributions as well as the negative values of Tajima's and Fu and Li's statistics further support the hypothesis that nucleotide variation within chromosomal arrangements still reflects expansion after the origin of the inversions. Under the expansion model, we have estimated the time of origin of the studied inversions.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, ComplementaryDrosophilaGenetic VariationInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRibosomal ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryDrosophila ProteinsInsect ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsRpL32 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID9872959
PMCPMC1460452
OpenAlexW2167529657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.