Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9872664›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1998

Repetitive DNA sequences in the common vole: cloning, characterization and chromosome localization of two novel complex repeats MS3 and MS4 from the genome of the East European vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis.

E A Elisaphenko, T B Nesterova, S M Duthie, O V Ruldugina, I B Rogozin, N Brockdorff, S M Zakian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  9. Distribution of L1-retroposons on the giant sex chromosomes of Microtus cabrerae (Arvicolidae, Rodentia): functional and evolutionary implications.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Various organizations of the complex repeats in vole sex chromosome heterochromatin.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  12. Population variation in the A chromosome distribution of satellite DNA and ribosomal DNA in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  13. Chromosomal localization of six repeated DNA sequences among species of Microtus (Rodentia).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2001
    Article
  16. Mosaic heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome in vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E A ElisaphenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk.
T B Nesterova
S M Duthie
O V Ruldugina
I B Rogozin
N Brockdorff
S M Zakian
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have characterized two novel, complex, heterochromatic repeat sequences, MS3 and MS4, isolated from Microtus rossiaemeridionalis genomic DNA. Sequence analysis indicates that both repeats consist of unique sequences interrupted by repeat elements of different origin and can be classified as long complex repeat units (LCRUs). A unique feature of both repeat units is the presence of short interspersed repeat elements (SINEs), which are usually characteristic of the euchromatic part of the genome. Comparative analysis revealed no significant stretches of homology in the nucleotide sequences between the two repeats, suggesting that the repeats originated independently during the course of vole genome evolution. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrates that MS3 and MS4 occupy distinct domains in the heterochromatic regions of the sex chromosomes in M. transcaspicus and M. arvalis but collocalize in M. rossiaemeridionalis and M. kirgisorum heterochromatic blocks. The localization pattern of the repeats on the vole chromosomes confirms the independent origin of the two repeats and suggests that expansion of the heterochromatic blocks has occurred subsequent to speciation.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsArvicolinaeBase SequenceBlotting, SouthernCloning, MolecularCytogeneticsEvolution, MolecularFemaleHeterochromatinIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid HybridizationHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID9872664
OpenAlexW190267183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.