Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9864223›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1999

Existing antilisterial immunity does not inhibit the development of a Listeria monocytogenes-specific primary cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response.

H G Bouwer, H Shen, X Fan, J F Miller, R A Barry, D J Hinrichs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CD8ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2017
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H G BouwerImmunology Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. bouwera@ohsu.edu
H Shen
X Fan
J F Miller
R A Barry
D J Hinrichs

Funding

UCLA Tumor Immunology Training ProgramT32CA009120 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Steven M. Dubinett, MICHAEL A TEITELL · 1985 to 2026
$10.3M
IMMUNOREGULATION OF ANTILISTERIAL IMMUNITYR01AI023455 · NIAID · PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER · PI HINRICHS, DAVID J. · 1985 to 2000
$232k
MHC CLASS IB IMMUNITY TO AN INTRACELLULAR PATHOGENR01AI040698 · NIAID · PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOUWER, H. G. ARCHIE · 1997 to 2000
$180k
L MONOCYTOGENES AS A LIVE VACCINE VEHICLER21AI038955 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MILLER, JEFFERY F. · 1996 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009120NIAID NIH HHS AI38955NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI23455NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI40698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection of BALB/c mice with Listeria monocytogenes stimulates an antilisterial immune response evident by the appearance of H2-Kd-restricted CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) specific for the nanomer peptides amino acids (aa) 91 to 99 of listeriolysin O (LLO 91-99) and aa 217 to 225 of the p60 molecule (p60 217-225). We have introduced point mutations at anchor residues within LLO 91-99 (92F) or p60 217-225 (218F), and BALB/c mice infected with L. monocytogenes strains containing these point mutations do not develop CTLs specific for LLO 91-99 or p60 217-225, respectively. We have used these strains to test whether primary CTL responses against L. monocytogenes-derived determinants can be stimulated within an environment of existing antilisterial immunity. We found that the development of a primary L. monocytogenes-specific CTL response is not altered by existing immunity to L. monocytogenes. For example, primary immunization with the p60 218F strain of L. monocytogenes followed by a secondary immunization with wild-type L. monocytogenes results in stimulation of p60 217-225-specific CTLs at primary response levels and LLO 91-99-specific effectors at levels consistent with a memory CTL response. Similarly, primary immunization with the 92F strain of L. monocytogenes followed by a secondary immunization with wild-type L. monocytogenes results in stimulation of LLO 91-99-specific CTLs at primary response levels and p60 217-225-specific effectors at levels consistent with a memory CTL response. These results provide additional support for the use of L. monocytogenes as a recombinant vaccine vector and show that antivector immunity does not inhibit the development of a primary CTL response when the epitope is delivered by L. monocytogenes as the vaccine strain.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsCytotoxicity, ImmunologicLymphocyte ActivationAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsFemaleGenetic VectorsHeat-Shock ProteinsHemolysin ProteinsImmunity, ActiveImmunity, CellularImmunity, InnateListeria monocytogenesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMutagenesis, Site-DirectedBacterial ToxinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHemolysin ProteinshlyA protein, Listeria monocytogenesPeptide FragmentsPhenylalanine

Identifiers

PMID9864223
PMCPMC96304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.