Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9862573›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer1998

A feasibility study of roquinimex (Linomide) and alpha interferon in patients with advanced malignant melanoma or renal carcinoma.

M J Mackean, D Kerr, M Lesko, A Svedberg, F Hansson, D Jodrell, J Cassidy

Abstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M J MackeanCRC Medical Oncology Department, Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, UK.
D Kerr
M Lesko
A Svedberg
F Hansson
D Jodrell
J Cassidy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirty-one patients with advanced renal carcinoma or malignant melanoma were treated in the first feasibility study of alpha-interferon (Roferon) and the new oral immunomodulating agent, Linomide. Linomide 5 mg or 10 mg p.o. daily was given for 2 weeks; alpha-interferon was then added at 3 MU s.c. three times weekly, escalating in each patient by 3 MU per week, if tolerable, up to 12 MJ. The combination was poorly tolerated with nausea, vomiting, somnolence and myalgia commonly reported. Adverse events accounted for treatment withdrawal in ten patients and contributed to withdrawal in four other patients. Treatment with Linomide alone in the first 2 weeks led to a significant increase in white blood cells, neutrophils and platelets. When alpha-interferon was added, the platelet count decreased significantly over the following 6 weeks. Nineteen patients had white cell phenotype and function measured. After 2 weeks of 5 mg Linomide, a transient but significant decrease in the absolute number of activated T-helper cells (CD4+DR+) was observed. No changes in natural killer (NK) cell number or activity were observed. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for response. One with metastatic renal cell carcinoma had a complete response and six had stable disease. This study does not support the use of the combination because significant toxicity was seen without the anticipated immunological benefits.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeasibility StudiesHumansHydroxyquinolinesInterferon-alphaKidney NeoplasmsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicHydroxyquinolinesInterferon-alpharoquinimex

Identifiers

PMID9862573
PMCPMC2063243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.