Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9862244›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1998

Population pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response of CGP 56697 (artemether + benflumetol) in malaria patients.

F Ezzet, R Mull, J Karbwang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F EzzetNovartis Pharma Ag., Basel, Switzerland.
R Mull
J Karbwang
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of artemether and benflumetol in a fixed combination tablet (CGP 56697) and to offer an explanation for the lower than expected cure rate in a Thai clinical trial.

methodsTwo hundred and sixty patients were enrolled into a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, dose-finding trial. CGP 56697 was given orally, either as: A, 4 x 4 tablets over 48 h; B, 4 x 2 tablets over 48 h or C, 3 x 4 tablets over 24 h. Each tablet contained artemether 20 mg amd benflumetol 120 mg. The pharmacokinetics were determined using a population-based approach combining full profiles (42 patients) and sparse data (218 patients). Parasite clearance time and 28 day cure rate were correlated with the derived pharmacokinetic parameters.

resultsThe median absorption half-life of benflumetol was 5.3 h, with a tmax of 10 h and terminal elimination half-life of 4.5 days. For artemether (and its metabolite, dihydroartemisinin), the corresponding values were 1.9 (1.9) h, 1.8 (1.2) h, and 0.84 (0.43) h. The variability in bioavailability of artemether and dihydroartemisinin was large both between doses and between patients, but was less pronounced for benflumetol. Compared with the first dose, benflumetol bioavailability was estimated to increase three-fold by the third and fourth doses. Higher artemether or dihydroartemisinin AUC was found to decrease parasite clearance time. Higher benflumetol AUC was found to significantly increase the chance of cure.

conclusionsUsing a population-based approach it was confirmed that the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benflumetol and artemether differ markedly. Benflumetol AUC is associated with cure and the effect of benflumetol when coadministered with artemether is to prevent recrudescence. The mode of action of benflumetol is consistent with its longer elimination half-life. A short course of low-dose artemether, which is rapidly absorbed and has a short elimination half-life, produced effective parasite clearance. The complementary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benflumetol and artemether was the main rationale for developing a fixed-dose combination. While the 4 x 4 dose regimen is very effective in most endemic areas, the poorer absorption (2.5 fold lower than in China) and the more resistant parasites in Thailand require higher doses of this drug.

Indexed as

ArtemisininsAdolescentAdultAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFemaleFluorenesHumansLumefantrineMalariaMaleMiddle AgedAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesLumefantrineSesquiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID9862244
PMCPMC1873796
OpenAlexW1921967810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.