ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998
Plasticity of the neoplastic phenotype in vivo is regulated by epigenetic factors.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mesenchymal stem cells in preclinical cancer cytotherapy: a systematic review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Pooled it
- The end of the genetic paradigm of cancer.PLoS biology · 2025Review
- Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.Journal of Cancer · 2022Review
- The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2021Article
- Cancer as an Embryological Phenomenon and Its Developmental Pathways: A Hypothesis regarding the Contribution of the Noncanonical Wnt Pathway.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2019Review
- Current Advance of Therapeutic Agents in Clinical Trials Potentially Targeting Tumor Plasticity.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Control of cancer formation by intrinsic genetic noise and microenvironmental cues.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015Review
- A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015Article
- Immunosuppressants in cancer prevention and therapy.Oncoimmunology · 2013Review
- The role of tumour-stromal interactions in modifying drug response: challenges and opportunities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2013Review
- Article
- How changes in extracellular matrix mechanics and gene expression variability might combine to drive cancer progression.PloS one · 2013Article
- Endogenous Voltage Potentials and the Microenvironment: Bioelectric Signals that Reveal, Induce and Normalize Cancer.Journal of clinical & experimental oncology · 2013Article
- From Reductionism to Holism: Systems-oriented Approaches in Cancer Research.Global advances in health and medicine · 2012Article
- Article
- Reprogramming human cancer cells in the mouse mammary gland.Cancer research · 2010Article
- The microenvironment determines the breast cancer cells' phenotype: organization of MCF7 cells in 3D cultures.BMC cancer · 2010Article
- Emerging anticancer therapeutic targets and the cardiovascular system: is there cause for concern?Circulation research · 2010Review
- Epigenetic effects on the mouse mandible: common features and discrepancies in remodeling due to muscular dystrophy and response to food consistency.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Activin receptor signaling regulates prostatic epithelial cell adhesion and viability.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age of host and transplantation-site microenvironment influence the tumorigenic potential of neoplastically transformed liver epithelial cells. Tumorigenic BAG2-GN6TF rat liver epithelial cells consistently form tumors at ectopic sites, but differentially express tumorigenicity or hepatocytic differentiation in the liver depending on host age and route of cell transplantation into the liver. Direct inoculation into host livers concentrates tumor cells locally, resulting in undifferentiated tumors near the transplantation site in both young (3-month-old) and old (18-month-old) rats. Transplantation-site tumors regress within 1 month in the livers of young rats, but grow progressively in old rats. However, inoculation of cells into the spleen distributes transplanted cells individually throughout the liver, resulting in hepatocytic differentiation by tumor cells with concomitant suppression of their tumorigenicity in young rats. When transplanted into livers of old rats by splenic inoculation, or when young hepatic-transplant recipients are allowed to age, hepatocytic progeny of BAG2-GN6TF cells proliferate to form foci, suggesting that the liver microenvironment of old rats incompletely regulates the proliferation and differentiation of tumor cell-derived hepatocytes. Upon removal from the liver, BAG2-GN6TF-derived hepatocytes revert to an undifferentiated, aggressively tumorigenic phenotype. We posit that the spectrum between normal differentiation and malignant potential of these cells reflects the dynamic interaction of the specific transformation-related genotype of the cells and the characteristics of the tissue microenvironment at the transplantation site. Changes in the tissue milieu, such as those that accompany normal aging, may determine the ability of a genetically aberrant cell to produce a tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.