Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9860969›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998

Plasticity of the neoplastic phenotype in vivo is regulated by epigenetic factors.

K D McCullough, W B Coleman, S L Ricketts, J W Wilson, G J Smith, J W Grisham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K D McCulloughDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
W B Coleman
S L Ricketts
J W Wilson
G J Smith
J W Grisham

Funding

TOXICOLOGYT32ES007126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ILONA JASPERS, Bernard E. Weissman · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
CLONAL ANALYSIS OF CARCINOGENESIS IN VITROR01CA029323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GRISHAM, JOE W · 1985 to 2002
$944k
AGE DEPENDENT LIVER TUMOR SUPPRESSION IN THE LIVERR01CA064340 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, GARY J · 1995 to 1999
–
CLONAL ANALYSIS OF CARCINOGENESIS IN VITROR37CA029323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GRISHAM, JOE W · 1990 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 29323NCI NIH HHS CA 64340NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES07126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age of host and transplantation-site microenvironment influence the tumorigenic potential of neoplastically transformed liver epithelial cells. Tumorigenic BAG2-GN6TF rat liver epithelial cells consistently form tumors at ectopic sites, but differentially express tumorigenicity or hepatocytic differentiation in the liver depending on host age and route of cell transplantation into the liver. Direct inoculation into host livers concentrates tumor cells locally, resulting in undifferentiated tumors near the transplantation site in both young (3-month-old) and old (18-month-old) rats. Transplantation-site tumors regress within 1 month in the livers of young rats, but grow progressively in old rats. However, inoculation of cells into the spleen distributes transplanted cells individually throughout the liver, resulting in hepatocytic differentiation by tumor cells with concomitant suppression of their tumorigenicity in young rats. When transplanted into livers of old rats by splenic inoculation, or when young hepatic-transplant recipients are allowed to age, hepatocytic progeny of BAG2-GN6TF cells proliferate to form foci, suggesting that the liver microenvironment of old rats incompletely regulates the proliferation and differentiation of tumor cell-derived hepatocytes. Upon removal from the liver, BAG2-GN6TF-derived hepatocytes revert to an undifferentiated, aggressively tumorigenic phenotype. We posit that the spectrum between normal differentiation and malignant potential of these cells reflects the dynamic interaction of the specific transformation-related genotype of the cells and the characteristics of the tissue microenvironment at the transplantation site. Changes in the tissue milieu, such as those that accompany normal aging, may determine the ability of a genetically aberrant cell to produce a tumor.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAgingAnimalsCell DivisionCell LineCells, CulturedLiverLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalLiver TransplantationMalePhenotypePostoperative ComplicationsRatsRats, Inbred F344

Identifiers

PMID9860969
PMCPMC28043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.