Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9858582›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

The yeast a1 and alpha2 homeodomain proteins do not contribute equally to heterodimeric DNA binding.

Y Jin, H Zhong, A K Vershon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bistable expression of WOR1, a master regulator of white-opaque switching in Candida albicans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic dissection of the cell-type-specification circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Life history and developmental processes in the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2000
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Y JinWaksman Institute of Microbiology and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8020, USA.
H Zhong
A K Vershon
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS OF A YEAST HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINR01GM049265 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI VERSHON, ANDREW · 1993 to 2005
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM49265NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In diploid cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the alpha2 and a1 homeodomain proteins bind cooperatively to sites in the promoters of haploid cell-type-specific genes (hsg) to repress their expression. Although both proteins bind to the DNA, in the alpha2 homeodomain substitutions of residues that are involved in contacting the DNA have little or no effect on repression in vivo or cooperative DNA binding with a1 protein in vitro. This result brings up the question of the contribution of each protein in the heterodimer complex to the DNA-binding affinity and specificity. To determine the requirements for the a1-alpha2 homeodomain DNA recognition, we systematically introduced single base-pair substitutions in an a1-alpha2 DNA-binding site and examined their effects on repression in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Our results show that nearly all substitutions that significantly decrease repression and DNA-binding affinity are at positions which are specifically contacted by either the alpha2 or a1 protein. Interestingly, an alpha2 mutant lacking side chains that make base-specific contacts in the major groove is able to discriminate between the wild-type and mutant DNA sites with the same sequence specificity as the wild-type protein. These results suggest that the specificity of alpha2 DNA binding in complex with a1 does not rely solely on the residues that make base-specific contacts. We have also examined the contribution of the a1 homeodomain to the binding affinity and specificity of the complex. In contrast to the lack of a defective phenotype produced by mutations in the alpha2 homeodomain, many of the alanine substitutions of residues in the a1 homeodomain have large effects on a1-alpha2-mediated repression and DNA binding. This result shows that the two proteins do not make equal contributions to the DNA-binding affinity of the complex.

Indexed as

Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Repressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsConsensus SequenceDimerizationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMutagenesisOperator Regions, GeneticPhenotypeReplication Protein CSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBCL2-related protein A1DNADNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMATA1 protein, S cerevisiaeMATA2 protein, S cerevisiaeMinor Histocompatibility AntigensProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Replication Protein CRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9858582
PMCPMC83916
OpenAlexW2111497410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.