Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9853425›Full record

ReviewCell proliferation

Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

A Ravaioli, L Bagli, A Zucchini, F Monti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell proliferation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Proteomic definition of normal human luminal and myoepithelial breast cells purified from reduction mammoplasties.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  7. Cell cycle checkpoints as therapeutic targets.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 1999
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A RavaioliDepartment of Oncology, Azienda USL Rimini, Italy.
L Bagli
A Zucchini
F Monti
Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the medical literature there are frequently conflicting reports on the utility of biological tumour markers available in the clinical management of breast cancer. In this review we analyse current information on the relationships between the most widely investigated breast cancer biological markers including oestrogen and progesterone receptors, p53, Bcl-2, c-erbB-2, cyclin expression, proliferative activity, DNA ploidy and the urokinase plasminogen activation system, as well as their relevance to prognosis and response to clinical treatment. By biological prognostic indicator, we mean a marker that correlates with survival and disease-free survival; the term predictor marker indicates a marker that is capable of predicting tumour sensitivity or resistance to various therapies. Similarly to other authors' experiences, our analysis suggests that oestrogen receptors are weak prognostic indicators and good predictors of response to endocrine therapy. Furthermore, there are consistent data suggesting that proliferation indices are good indicators of prognosis, and that they are directly related to response to chemotherapy and closely related to response to hormonotherapy. On the contrary, there is no evidence or conflicting data for all of the other biological markers. These should be considered in the context of randomized trials in order to precisely define their prognostic and predictive roles. p53 and c-erbB-2 seem to be the most promising factors, but their use in routine practice still needs validation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell DivisionFemaleHumansPloidiesPrognosisProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptors, SteroidTreatment OutcomeUrokinase-Type Plasminogen ActivatorBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptors, SteroidUrokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID9853425
PMCPMC6495893
OpenAlexW2134325872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.