ArticleThe Journal of physiology1999
Microdialysis update: optimizing the advantages.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Droplet-based microdialysis-Concept, theory, and design considerations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2008Article
- Bench-to-bedside review: microdialysis in intensive care medicine.Critical care (London, England) · 2004Review
- Effects of voltage-sensitive calcium channel blockers on extracellular dopamine levels in rat striatum.Metabolic brain disease · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microdialysis was introduced in the early 1970s as a method to measure dynamic release of substances in the brain (see Tossman & Ungerstedt, 1986). The technique has been refined over the past three decades due to the development of new materials for dialysis membranes and commercial availability of smaller, more consistently fabricated probes. A typical microdialysis probe consists of rigid metal concentric tubing with a semipermeable region at the tip (Fig. 1). Molecules of restricted size passively diffuse from the brain through the dialysis membrane into an infusion solution which is then directed out of the brain and collected in tubes for serial analysis of substance content. Probes are inserted into the brain region of interest, typically making lesions during their travel through the brain and at the sampling site. Once the trauma of insertion subsides, usually after an hour or so, probes collect substances released from axons projecting to dendrites and cell bodies of the targeted area. Substances surrounding the semipermeable region of the probe passively diffuse down a concentration gradient into the solution infused through the probe. Substance recovery from the brain decreases exponentially with faster infusion rates. A high precision infusion pump is critical for maintaining constant flow through the probes to ensure that altered substance content in the dialysates reflects changes in release by the brain and not variable diffusion gradients resulting from sporadic changes in flow rates through the probes. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is commonly used to measure target substances in the dialysates, but other methods such as radioimmunoassay may be employed. The development of microbore columns for HPLC (Durkin et al. 1985) and their commercial availability by the mid 1990s has made it possible to accurately measure smaller amounts of substances in the dialysates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.