Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9850189›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis1998

Reference distributions for immunoglobulins A, G, and M: a comparison of a large cohort to the world's literature.

R F Ritchie, G E Palomaki, L M Neveux, O Navolotskaia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F RitchieFoundation for Blood Research, Scarborough, Maine 04074, USA. ritchie@fbr.org
G E Palomaki
L M Neveux
O Navolotskaia
Foundation for Blood Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical interpretation of immunoglobulin measurements requires accurate and precise assays and widely accepted reference preparations, as well as reliable age- and gender-specific reference ranges. This last requirement, the topic of numerous publications, has not been addressed adequately. By a combination of computerized and hand searching of the literature from 1961 to 1997, we identified 109 publications presenting IgA, IgG, and/or IgM reference data in healthy individuals. After eliminating studies that lacked appropriate clinical, statistical, or reference material information, data from the 17 acceptable studies were converted to a common reference material, CRM 470/RPPHS. When median levels from our recently published large cohort study are superimposed on these published medians, they fall within the ranges of reported medians. The widths of published 95 percentile reference ranges (where each individual's health was verified) were also found to agree closely with the reference range widths found in our data (where inclusion was based on the reported diagnosis). The current combined study of narrowly applied reference ranges validates our recently published age- and gender-specific reference data for immunoglobulinsA, G, and M. Those new data can now be considered as a source of reliable reference ranges to be used by laboratories when interpreting immunoglobulin measurements.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleMEDLINERacial GroupsReference ValuesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID9850189
PMCPMC6807938
OpenAlexW1964327261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.