Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9849983›Full record

ArticleThe Pediatric infectious disease journal1998

Management of neonatal candidiasis. Neonatal Candidiasis Study Group.

J L Rowen, J M Tate

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Congenital systemic candidiasis: a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of 44 cases.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preterm neonates with candidal brain microabscesses: a case series.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Invasive fungal infection in very low birthweight infants: national prospective surveillance study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006
    Article
  12. Survey of neonatal candidiasis in Greece.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neonatal candidiasis: analysis of epidemiology, drug susceptibility, and molecular typing of causative isolates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Article
  15. Low yield of ancillary diagnostic studies in neonates infected with Candida.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2004
    Article
  16. Review
  17. High-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the therapy of systemic candidiasis in neonates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2003
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L RowenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0371, USA. jrowen@utmb.edu
J M Tate
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Pilot Project for the DTMI CRA ProgramUL1RR024128 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$48.1M
Early Diagnosis of Neonatal CandidiasisK23HD044799 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2005 to 2008
$610k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024128NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD044799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify areas of consensus and controversy in the management of neonatal candidiasis.

methodsA questionnaire was distributed to US-based members of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and a sampling of US neonatologists.

resultsThree hundred eighty evaluable questionnaires were returned (42% of those mailed). Ninety-five percent of respondents have cared for an infant with systemic candidiasis in the past 2 years. Fluconazole and liposomal amphotericin are used to some extent by 90 and 69% of respondents, respectively. A single blood culture positive for Candida led to a recommendation for immediate treatment by 99%; amphotericin B was the preferred therapy for candidemia (88%). More than 80% of respondents would request cerebrospinal fluid, urine and repeat blood cultures and ophthalmologic examination in the evaluation of candidemia. If a cerebrospinal fluid culture is positive, 25% would use amphotericin B alone whereas 62% would add flucytosine. For candiduria Society members chose fluconazole therapy more often than did neonatologists, 23% vs. 3.4% (P<0.001). There was no consensus concerning duration of therapy, use of an amphotericin B test dose or management of a central catheter in place during candidemia.

conclusionsSystemic candidiasis in neonates is a frequently encountered clinical problem. There is agreement that prompt therapy with amphotericin B is required if a blood culture is positive for Candida and that such infants require additional evaluations. Other antifungals (fluconazole, liposomal amphotericin B) are used to some extent in this population. Many issues in management have no clear consensus and warrant further research.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisDecision MakingFungemiaHumansInfant, NewbornSurveys and QuestionnairesAmphotericin BAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID9849983
PMCPMC3058476
OpenAlexW2041705779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.