ReviewMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)1998
[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].
Review in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis of patients with long-standing fever.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfections are a major cause of mortality in neutropenic patients. They require long hospital stays and highly expensive therapeutic measures. In this review we discuss the practical and pharmaco-economic aspects of the management of febrile neutropenia. PREVENTION AND THERAPY: Prevention of fever of unknown origin (FUO) demands hygienic and antimicrobiotic measures. First-line antibiotic therapy consists of an aminoglycoside combined with an ureidopenicillin or a 3rd-generation cephalosporin. Double beta-lactam antibiotic combinations are equally effective and less toxic, but more expensive. Monotherapy with carbapenems, ceftazidime, or cefepime appear to offer comparable efficacy. Lung infiltrates require immediate treatment with amphotericin B. If the initial therapeutic regime fails, a carbapenem plus a glycopeptide antibiotic and a parenteral antimycotic drug should be applied after 3 to 4 days. The prophylactic or interventional administration of hematopoietic growth factors is only indicated in special high-risk situations.
conclusionsUsing the described therapeutic procedure, the response rate exceeds 90%. Consistent, step-wise escalating administration of antibiotics is essential. More evaluation is needed to determine whether selected patients with febrile neutropenia can be treated on an outpatient basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9849051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.