ArticleJournal of virology1999
AIDS vaccination studies using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: detailed analysis of the humoral immune response to a protective vaccine.
Article in Journal of virology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- AIDS vaccination studies using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: failure to protect and possible enhancement of challenge infection by four cell-based vaccines prepared with autologous lymphoblasts.Journal of virology · 2002Article
- AIDS vaccination studies using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: reevaluation of neutralizing antibody levels elicited by a protective and a nonprotective vaccine after removal of antisubstrate cell antibodies.Journal of virology · 2001Article
- Immunogenicity of an anti-clade B feline immunodeficiency fixed-cell virus vaccine in field cats.Journal of virology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) cat model is extensively used to investigate possible vaccination approaches against AIDS in humans. Although consistent levels of protection have been achieved with FIV, as with other model systems, by immunizing with whole inactivated virus or fixed infected cells, the mechanisms responsible for protection are elusive. In previous studies we showed that cats immunized with a vaccine consisting of fixed infected cells were protected or unprotected against cell-free or cell-associated FIV challenge depending on the time interval between completion of vaccination and challenge. In an attempt to define possible humoral immune correlates of protection, selected sera harvested at the times of challenge from such cats were examined for anti-FIV-antibody titers and properties by using binding and functional immunological assays. Binding assays included quantitative Western blotting, enzyme-linked tests for antibodies to FIV glycoproteins and immunodominant linear epitopes, and tests for measuring conformation dependence and avidity of anti-viral-envelope antibodies. Functional assays included virus neutralization performed with two different cell substrates, complement- and antibody-dependent virolysis, blocking of reverse transcriptase, and an assay that measured the ability of sera to prevent FIV growth in cocultures of infected and uninfected cells. Despite the wide spectrum of parameters investigated, no correlation between vaccine-induced protection and the humoral parameters measured was noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.