Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9847110›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1998

Regulation of apoplastic NH4+ concentration in leaves of oilseed rape

Nielsen, Schjoerring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Function and Regulation of Ammonium Transporters in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Tolerant mechanisms to OJournal of plant research · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subcellular NHThe New phytologist · 2002
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Futile transmembrane NH4(+) cycling: a cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

NielsenPlant Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Schjoerring

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of apoplastic NH4+ concentration in leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) was studied using a vacuum-infiltration technique that allowed controlled manipulations of the apoplastic solution. In leaves infiltrated with NH4+-free solution, the apoplastic NH4+ concentration returned in less than 1.5 min to the preinfiltration level of 0.8 mM. Infiltrated 15NH4+ was rapidly diluted by 14NH4+/14NH3 effluxed from the cell. The exchange rate of 15N/14N over the apoplast due to combined 14N efflux from the symplast and 15N influx from the apoplastic solution was 29.4 &mgr;mol g-1 fresh weight h-1 between 0 and 5 min after infiltration. The net uptake of NH4+ into the leaf cells increased linearly with apoplastic NH4+ concentrations between 2 and 10 mM and could be partially inhibited by the channel inhibitors La3+ and tetraethylammonium and by Na+ and K+. When apoplastic pH increased from 5.0 to 8.0, the steady-state apoplastic NH4+ concentration decreased from 1.0 to 0.3 mM. Increasing temperature increased the rate of NH4+ net uptake and reduced the apoplastic steady-state NH4+ concentration. We conclude that the apoplastic solution in leaves of oilseed rape constitutes a highly dynamic NH4+ pool.

Identifiers

PMID9847110
PMCPMC34752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.