Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9843586›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell1998

Specific molecular chaperone interactions and an ATP-dependent conformational change are required during posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast ER.

A J McClellan, J B Endres, J P Vogel, D Palazzi, M D Rose, J L Brodsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanical properties of BiP protein determined by nano-rheology.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Single molecule force spectroscopy reveals the effect of BiP chaperone on protein folding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
  10. Growth Rate as a Direct Regulator of the Start Network to Set Cell Size.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A J McClellanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
J B Endres
J P Vogel
D Palazzi
M D Rose
J L Brodsky
Princeton University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Nuclear and Cell Fusion in YeastR01GM037739 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ROSE, MARK DAVID · 1987 to 2016
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-37739NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The posttranslational translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane in yeast requires ATP hydrolysis and the action of hsc70s (DnaK homologues) and DnaJ homologues in both the cytosol and ER lumen. Although the cytosolic hsc70 (Ssa1p) and the ER lumenal hsc70 (BiP) are homologous, they cannot substitute for one another, possibly because they interact with specific DnaJ homologues on each side of the ER membrane. To investigate this possibility, we purified Ssa1p, BiP, Ydj1p (a cytosolic DnaJ homologue), and a GST-63Jp fusion protein containing the lumenal DnaJ region of Sec63p. We observed that BiP, but not Ssa1p, is able to associate with GST-63Jp and that Ydj1p stimulates the ATPase activity of Ssa1p up to 10-fold but increases the ATPase activity of BiP by <2-fold. In addition, Ydj1p and ATP trigger the release of an unfolded polypeptide from Ssa1p but not from BiP. To understand further how BiP drives protein translocation, we purified four dominant lethal mutants of BiP. We discovered that each mutant is defective for ATP hydrolysis, fails to undergo an ATP-dependent conformational change, and cannot interact with GST-63Jp. Measurements of protein translocation into reconstituted proteoliposomes indicate that the mutants inhibit translocation even in the presence of wild-type BiP. We conclude that a conformation- and ATP-dependent interaction of BiP with the J domain of Sec63p is essential for protein translocation and that the specificity of hsc70 action is dictated by their DnaJ partners.

Indexed as

Membrane Transport ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateBase SequenceBiological Transport, ActiveDNA PrimersEndoplasmic ReticulumFungal ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsIntracellular MembranesMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular ChaperonesAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateDNA PrimersFungal ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsKAR2 protein, yeastMembrane ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSEC63 protein, S cerevisiaeSSA1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID9843586
PMCPMC25671
OpenAlexW2162791176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.