ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Real-world' priority setting for service improvement in English primary care: a decentred approach.Public management review · 2023Article
- Advancing the WHO-INTEGRATE Framework as a Tool for Evidence-Informed, Deliberative Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Views of Developers and Users of WHO Guidelines.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Precision medicine and the principle of equal treatment: a conjoint analysis.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Public perspectives on acquired brain injury rehabilitation and components of care: A Citizens' Jury.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- From General Principles to Procedural Values: Responsible Digital Health Meets Public Health Ethics.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020Article
- Development of the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: an overview of systematic reviews of decision criteria for health decision-making.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2020Review
- Systematic review for the development of a pharmaceutical and medical products prioritization framework.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2019Article
- Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist.International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy.International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Value judgment of health interventions from different perspectives: arguments and criteria.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2018Review
- Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health.Lancet (London, England) · 2017Article
- The Need for Global Application of the Accountability for Reasonableness Approach to Support Sustainable Outcomes Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy".International journal of health policy and management · 2017Article
- Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy".International journal of health policy and management · 2017Article
- Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.International journal of health policy and management · 2016Article
- Appropriateness for Total Joint Replacement: Perspectives of Decision-Makers.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2016Article
- Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.International journal of health policy and management · 2015Review
- What should dental services for people with disabilities be like? Results of an Irish Delphi panel survey.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9841021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.