ArticleGene expression1998
RNA polymerase II transcription complex assembly in nuclear extracts.
Article in Gene expression, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA-dependent RNA polymerase incorporates β-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) linking Molnupiravir to host transcription-dependent mutagenesis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Mechanobiology of Chromatin and the Nuclear Interior.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2016Article
- Discrete promoter elements affect specific properties of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro transcription systems based on nuclear extracts of eukaryotic cells continue to be valuable experimental systems for assessing function of promoter sequences and defining new activities involved in transcription complex assembly and activity, but many aspects of such systems have not been experimentally examined. Here, transcription complex assembly on the promoter from the long terminal repeat of mouse mammary tumor virus was assessed in vitro with a transcription system derived from nuclear extracts of cultured HeLa cells. The extent of preinitiation complex assembly on the promoter was limited by the availability of template, even though only a small fraction of the template present in the assays participated in transcription. These results support a model for transcription complex assembly in which template DNA has two alternative fates, one leading to assembly of a functional transcription complex, and another that leads to irreversible template inactivation. The observed kinetics of assembly reflects loss of template by both pathways and is dominated by a relatively rapid rate of template inactivation. Supplementing nuclear extracts with purified TATA binding protein increased the extent as well as the apparent rate of assembly. Both effects can be explained by a TATA binding protein-dependent increase in the rate of assembly that leads to altered partitioning of template between competing pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9840811PMC6151951W45346346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.