Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9836481›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer1998

Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists' Group.

K Aabo, M Adams, P Adnitt, D S Alberts, A Athanazziou, V Barley, D R Bell, U Bianchi, G Bolis, M F Brady and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Crystal structures of chlorido-[dihy-droxybis-(1-imino-eth-oxy)]arsanido-κActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2020
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Glutathione in Ovarian Cancer: A Double-Edged Sword.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K Aabo
M Adams
P Adnitt
D S Alberts
A Athanazziou
V Barley
D R Bell
U Bianchi
G Bolis
M F Brady
H S Brodovsky
H Bruckner
M Buyse
R Canetta
V Chylak
C J Cohen
N Colombo
P F Conte
D Crowther
J H Edmonson
C Gennatas
E Gilbey
M Gore
D Guthrie
B Y Yeap
MRC Cancer Unit · GBMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic study was to provide an up to date and reliable quantitative summary of the relative benefits of various types of chemotherapy (non-platinum vs platinum, single-agent vs combination and carboplatin vs cisplatin) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Also, to investigate whether well-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from cisplatin- or carboplatin-based therapy. Meta-analyses were based on updated individual patient data from all available randomized controlled trials (published and unpublished), including 37 trials, 5667 patients and 4664 deaths. The results suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than non-platinum therapy, show a trend in favour of platinum combinations over single-agent platinum, and suggest that cisplatin and carboplatin are equally effective. There is no good evidence that cisplatin is more or less effective than carboplatin in any particular subgroup of patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCisplatinFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID9836481
PMCPMC2063202
OpenAlexW120771606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.