ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1998
Predicting the time course of haemoglobin in children treated with erythropoietin for renal anaemia.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant human erythropoietin for the treatment of renal anaemia in children: no justification for bodyweight-adjusted dosage.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2004Trial
- Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in children with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Review
- Impact of mathematical pharmacology on practice and theory: four case studies.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018Article
- Facilitation of drug evaluation in children by population methods and modelling.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo establish a pharmacodynamic model that allows one to predict the haemoglobin (Hb) response to EPO in children as a function of dose and time, and to derive recommendations for initial dosing and subsequent dose adjustment.
methodsHaemoglobin was monitored in eight children aged 8-15 years with anaemia due to renal failure during treatment with EPO. All patients were free of conditions known to impair the response to EPO. Pretreatment Hb was 4.9-9.0 g dl(-1). The drug was administered once weekly by subcutaneous injection; doses ranged from 1700 to 6800 U week (-1). Hb was monitored for 4-38 months. The Hb-time data were analysed by applying a population pharmacodynamic model proposed for EPO in adult haemodialysis patients. Internal model validation was carried out by using a bootstrap procedure.
resultsThe increase of Hb during treatment with EPO was linear until steady state was reached after 103+/-33 days (mean +/- interindividual s.d.). The weekly gain in Hb from the onset of therapy to steady state was 0.0805+/-0.026 g dl(-1) (mean +/- interindividual s.d.) for every 1000 U EPO week (-1); it did not exhibit a dependence on body weight. Estimated mean prediction errors are +/-1.53 g dl(-1) for predictions that are based on the mean population parameters and +/-0.83 g dl(-1) for predictions that take into account the complete individual Hb-time data up to and including steady state.
conclusionsThe model describes the time course of the Hb response to EPO in children with renal anaemia. The required weekly EPO dose should initially be calculated from the individual pretreatment Hb and the desired Hb at steady state by using the mean population estimates of the weekly gain in Hb per dose unit before steady state (beta) and the time needed to reach steady state (tau). A reduction of the initial dose according to body weight is not justified by the available evidence. beta should be re-estimated individually after 6 weeks of treatment and dose should be adjusted accordingly. A final dose adjustment should be made when steady state has been reached based on individual estimates of beta and tau.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.