Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9833599›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1998

Predicting the time course of haemoglobin in children treated with erythropoietin for renal anaemia.

R E Port, R W Ding, T Fies, K Schärer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Impact of mathematical pharmacology on practice and theory: four case studies.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R E PortGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.
R W Ding
T Fies
K Schärer
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo establish a pharmacodynamic model that allows one to predict the haemoglobin (Hb) response to EPO in children as a function of dose and time, and to derive recommendations for initial dosing and subsequent dose adjustment.

methodsHaemoglobin was monitored in eight children aged 8-15 years with anaemia due to renal failure during treatment with EPO. All patients were free of conditions known to impair the response to EPO. Pretreatment Hb was 4.9-9.0 g dl(-1). The drug was administered once weekly by subcutaneous injection; doses ranged from 1700 to 6800 U week (-1). Hb was monitored for 4-38 months. The Hb-time data were analysed by applying a population pharmacodynamic model proposed for EPO in adult haemodialysis patients. Internal model validation was carried out by using a bootstrap procedure.

resultsThe increase of Hb during treatment with EPO was linear until steady state was reached after 103+/-33 days (mean +/- interindividual s.d.). The weekly gain in Hb from the onset of therapy to steady state was 0.0805+/-0.026 g dl(-1) (mean +/- interindividual s.d.) for every 1000 U EPO week (-1); it did not exhibit a dependence on body weight. Estimated mean prediction errors are +/-1.53 g dl(-1) for predictions that are based on the mean population parameters and +/-0.83 g dl(-1) for predictions that take into account the complete individual Hb-time data up to and including steady state.

conclusionsThe model describes the time course of the Hb response to EPO in children with renal anaemia. The required weekly EPO dose should initially be calculated from the individual pretreatment Hb and the desired Hb at steady state by using the mean population estimates of the weekly gain in Hb per dose unit before steady state (beta) and the time needed to reach steady state (tau). A reduction of the initial dose according to body weight is not justified by the available evidence. beta should be re-estimated individually after 6 weeks of treatment and dose should be adjusted accordingly. A final dose adjustment should be made when steady state has been reached based on individual estimates of beta and tau.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnemiaBody WeightChildErythropoietinFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleRenal InsufficiencyTime FactorsErythropoietinHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID9833599
PMCPMC1873696
OpenAlexW1906351603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.