Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9826656›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998

The orientation of the AP-1 heterodimer on DNA strongly affects transcriptional potency.

M Chytil, B R Peterson, D A Erlanson, G L Verdine

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Dynamics of Fos-Jun-NFAT1 complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ChytilDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
B R Peterson
D A Erlanson
G L Verdine
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of gene transcription in eukaryotes requires the cooperative assembly of an initiation complex containing many protein subunits. The necessity that these components contact each other and the promoter/enhancer in defined ways suggests that their spatial arrangement might influence the activation response. Indeed, growing evidence indicates that DNA architecture can profoundly affect transcriptional potency. Much less is known about the influence of protein architecture on transcriptional activation. Here, we examine the architectural dependence of activator function through the analysis of matched pairs of AP-1*DNA complexes differing only in their orientation. Mutation of a critical Arg residue in the basic-leucine zipper domain of either Fos or Jun yielded single point-mutant heterodimers that bind DNA in a single defined orientation, as determined directly by native chemical ligation/affinity cleavage; by contrast, the corresponding wild-type protein binds DNA as a roughly equal mixture of two isomeric orientations, which are related by subunit interchange. The stereochemistry of the point-mutant heterodimers could be switched by inversion of a C*G base pair in the center of the AP-1 site, thus providing access to both fixed orientational isomers. Yeast reporter gene assays consistently revealed that one orientational isomer activates transcription at least 10-fold more strongly than the other. These results suggest that protein architecture, especially the spatial relationship of the activation domain to the promoter, can exert a powerful influence on activator potency.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryTranscription, GeneticArginineBase SequenceBinding SitesDimerizationDNALeucine ZippersModels, MolecularOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPoint MutationProtein MultimerizationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junRecombinant ProteinsArginineDNAOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junRecombinant ProteinsTranscription Factor AP-1

Identifiers

PMID9826656
PMCPMC24329
OpenAlexW2099998608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.