Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9826353›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1998

A vaccine and monoclonal antibodies that enhance mouse resistance to Candida albicans vaginal infection.

Y Han, R P Morrison, J E Cutler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Vaccines against candidiasis: Status, challenges and emerging opportunity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Monoclonal Antibodies as Tools to Combat Fungal Infections.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immunochemistry of pathogenic yeast, Candida species, focusing on mannan.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y HanDepartment of Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3520, USA.
R P Morrison
J E Cutler
Montana State University · US

Funding

PHOSPHOMANNOPROTEIN ADHESIN AS A VACCINE CANDIDATEP01AI037194 · NIAID · LA BIOMED RES INST/ HARBOR UCLA MED CTR · PI EDWARDS, JOHN E. · 1995 to 2003
$3.6M
IMMUNITY TO CHLAMYDIAL GENITAL INFECTIONR01AI038991 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MORRISON, RICHARD P. · 1996 to 2009
$2.8M
CANDIDA ALBICANS SURFACE ANTIGENSR01AI024912 · NIAID · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY (BOZEMAN) · PI CUTLER, JIM E. · 1988 to 2006
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI037194NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI37194NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI024912NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI038991NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI24912NIAID NIH HHS R01 AIM38991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that a vaccine composed of liposome-mannan complexes of Candida albicans (L-mann) stimulates mice to produce protective antibodies against disseminated candidiasis. An immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal antibody (MAb), B6.1, specific for a beta-1,2-mannotriose in the complexes protects against the disease, whereas MAb B6 does not. In the present study, the vaccine and MAbs B6.1 and B6 were tested for the ability to protect against Candida vaginal infection, established by intravaginal (i.vg.) inoculation of yeast cells in mice maintained in pseudoestrus. Fungal CFU in each vagina was determined to assess the severity of infection. Mice vaccinated before infection developed about 62% fewer vaginal CFU than nonimmunized controls. Naive mice that received polyclonal antiserum (from vaccinated mice) i.vg. before infection had 60% fewer CFU than controls. The serum protective factor was stable at 56 degreesC, but C. albicans cells absorbed this factor. Mice given MAb B6.1 i.vg. after infection was established had fewer Candida CFU in vaginal tissue than control mice given buffer instead of antibody. MAbs B6.1 and B6 given intraperitoneally before infection protected mice, but MAbs preabsorbed with yeast cells did not. MAb B6.1 also protected against C. tropicalis vaginal infection, but MAb B6 did not. The protective activities of MAbs B6.1 and B6 appeared to be specific because an irrelevant IgM carbohydrate-specific MAb and an irrelevant IgG protein-specific MAb were not protective; also, MAb B6.1 did not affect development of vaginal chlamydial infection. These studies show that an appropriate antibody response, or administration of protective antibodies, can help the host to resist Candida vaginal infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, FungalAntibodies, MonoclonalCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFemaleFungal VaccinesImmunity, InnateImmunization, PassiveMannansMiceSpecies SpecificityVaccinationAntibodies, FungalAntibodies, MonoclonalFungal VaccinesMannans

Identifiers

PMID9826353
PMCPMC108729
OpenAlexW2118420662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.