Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9822589›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal1998

Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome.

J Jiricny

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Life without dUTPase.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
  5. DNA triplet repeat expansion and mismatch repair.Annual review of biochemistry · 2015
    Review
  6. Mismatch repair protein expression in colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Postreplicative mismatch repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J JiricnyInstitute of Medical Radiobiology of the University of Zürich and the Paul Scherrer-Institute, August Forel-Strasse 7, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of a link between the malfunction of post-replicative mismatch correction and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, the study of this complex repair pathway has received a great deal of attention. Our understanding of the mammalian system was facilitated by conservation of the main protagonists of this process from microbes to humans. Thus, biochemical experiments carried out with Escherichia coli extracts helped us to identify functional human homologues of the bacterial mismatch repair proteins, while the genetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae aided our understanding of the phenotypes of human cells deficient in mismatch correction. Today, mismatch repair is no longer thought of solely as the mechanism responsible for the correction of replication errors, whose failure demonstrates itself in the form of a mutator phenotype and microsatellite instability. Malfunction of this process has been implicated also in mitotic and meiotic recombination, drug and ionizing radiation resistance, transcription-coupled repair and apoptosis. Elucidation of the roles of mismatch repair proteins in these transduction pathways is key to our understanding of the role of mismatch correction in human cancer. However, in order to unravel all the complexities involved in post-replicative mismatch correction, we need to know the cast and the roles of the individual players. This brief treatise provides an overview of our current knowledge of the biochemistry of this process.

Indexed as

GenomeBase Pair MismatchDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliHumans

Identifiers

PMID9822589
PMCPMC1170991
OpenAlexW2115047855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.