Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9822406›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Refugees and primary care: tackling the inequalities.

D Jones, P S Gill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Refugee experiences of general practice in countries of resettlement: a literature review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. When should patient intuition be taken seriously?Journal of general internal medicine · 2011
    Review
  7. Asylum seekers, refugees, and the politics of access to health care: a UK perspective.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Access to health care for people seeking asylum in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
  15. Primary care for refugees and asylum seekers.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. What brings asylum seekers to the United Kingdom?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A comprehensive refugee health screening program.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D JonesDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical Schools, Whittington Hospital, London N19 SNF, UK. d.l.jones@ucl.ac.uk
P S Gill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRefugeesHealth ExpendituresHumansPrimary Health CareSocial JusticeState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID9822406
PMCPMC1114300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.