Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9822401›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Sex differences in the use of asthma drugs: cross sectional study.

M Sexton, M D Althuis, N Santanello, S Hyndman, R Williams, D Schmeidler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M SextonDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA. msexon@epl.umaryland.edu
M D Althuis
N Santanello
S Hyndman
R Williams
D Schmeidler
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USNuffield Health · GBUnited States Military Academy · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the use of asthma drugs by men and women with asthma and to identify sex specific predictors for the use of oral steroids.

designCross sectional study.

settingSix general practices in East Anglia. SUBJECTS: 103 men and 134 women aged 20-54 with asthma.

main outcome measuresSelf reported use of agonists, inhaled steroids, and oral steroids.

resultsNo sex difference was found in use of agonists or inhaled steroids. However a strong association existed between sex and oral steroid use. 40 (30%) women reported using oral steroids compared with nine (9%) men. Women were more than five times (odds ratio=5.5, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 13.7) more likely to report use of oral steroids than men after asthma symptoms, age, visits to the general practitioner in previous six months, and time since diagnosis of asthma were controlled for. Women who had visited the general practitioner for asthma one or more times in the previous six months were four times (3.9, 1.6 to 9.5) as likely to report use of oral steroids. In addition, more frequent visits to the general practitioner for asthma were related in a dose-response manner to a greater likelihood of using oral steroids among women after asthma symptoms, age, and time since diagnosis were controlled for. This relation was not observed among men.

conclusionWomen used oral steroids more than men. The more frequent consultations with a doctor by women may result in more requests for oral steroids or doctors may preferentially prescribe oral steroids to women.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRegression AnalysisSex DistributionSteroidsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID9822401
PMCPMC28725
OpenAlexW2006219737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.