Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9812935›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach.

A McColl, P Roderick, J Gabbay, H Smith, M Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. The Public Health Impact score: a new measure of public health effectiveness for general practices in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The UK pay-for-performance programme in primary care: estimation of population mortality reduction.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  20. The relationship between prescribing expenditure and quality in primary care: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A McCollWessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, Health Care Research Unit. a.m.ccoll@soton.ac.uk
P Roderick
J Gabbay
H Smith
M Moore

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Services AccessibilityHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID9812935
PMCPMC1114248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.