Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9811320›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology1998

Warner-Lambert/Parke-Davis Award Lecture. Pathological and physiological double-strand breaks: roles in cancer, aging, and the immune system.

M R Lieber

Open access · greenAbstract readLectureReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2006
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Homologous Recombination and Its Role in Carcinogenesis.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2002
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R LieberDepartment of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 91007, USA. lieber_m@froggy.hsc.usc.edu
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Cancer PainR01CA091007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SIMONE, DONALD · 2001 to 2011
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathological agents such as ionizing radiation and oxidative free radicals can cause breaks in both strands of the DNA at a given site (double-strand break). This is the most serious type of DNA damage because neither strand is able to provide physical integrity or information content, as would be the case for single-strand DNA damage where one strand of the duplex remains intact. The repair of such breaks usually results in an irreversible alteration of the DNA. Two physiological forms of intentional double-strand (ds) DNA breakage and rejoining occur during lymphoid differentiation. One is V(D)J recombination occurring during early B and T cell development, and the other is class switch recombination, occurring exclusively in mature B cells. The manner in which physiological and most pathological double-strand DNA breaks are rejoined to restore chromosomal integrity are the same. Defects during the phases in which pathological or physiological breaks are generated or in which they are joined can result in chromosomal translocations or loss of genetic information at the site of breakage. Such events are the first step in some cancers and may be a key contributor to changes in DNA with age. Inherited defects in this process can result in severe combined immune deficiency. Hence, pathological and physiological DNA double-strand breaks are related to immune defects and cancer and may be one of the key ways in which DNA is damaged during aging.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAgingAnimalsAwards and PrizesDNA RepairHumansImmunityNeoplasmsPathologyRecombination, GeneticSocieties, MedicalTranslocation, GeneticUnited States

Identifiers

PMID9811320
PMCPMC1853386
OpenAlexW119749093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.