Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9810316›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]1998

[Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal carcinoma. The current status].

C Rödel, W Hohenberger, R Sauer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery for advanced rectal cancer : prognostic significance of tumor regression.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Indications for neoadjuvant therapy in rectal carcinoma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2003
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C RödelStrahlentherapeutische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
W Hohenberger
R Sauer
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Consensus Conference of the German Cancer Society (CAO/AIO/ARO, 1.7.1998) has recently updated recommendations for patients with rectal cancer. Instead of a former reservation regarding the indication of adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer the actual version of the consensus particularly emphasizes the role of postoperative radiochemotherapy for stage-II/III tumors. This article reviews the most recent and ongoing trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer.

resultsTo avoid local recurrence is the most important aspect in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. In some series, e.g. the results of the Surgical Department of the University of Erlangen, a significant correlation between local control and survival was noted. The final results of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial with 1168 randomized patients not only confirmed the potential of radiotherapy to reduce local recurrence rate, but also demonstrated a significant survival advantage for patients receiving short-course preoperative radiation therapy. Postoperative combination therapy is usual in the United States and in most European countries since the publication of two randomized trials of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The survival advantage resulting from an adjuvant radiotherapy with conventional doses and concurrent fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone was recently confirmed in a Norwegian trial. Protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion should further improve treatment results. Numerous phase-II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy with high rates of pathological response. Thus, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced tumor primarily not amenable to curative surgery. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing to clarify the role of preoperative versus postoperative combined treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer.

conclusionRadiochemotherapy for rectal cancer is recommended as standard treatment outside clinical trials for stage II/III patients after curative treatment and for patients with T4-tumor prior to surgery. The optimal use of chemotherapy and the sequence of treatment modalities remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

CarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative CarePreoperative CarePrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID9810316
OpenAlexW1156164629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.