Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9807537›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health1998

The effects of a health promotion-health protection intervention on behavior change: the WellWorks Study.

G Sorensen, A Stoddard, M K Hunt, J R Hebert, J K Ockene, J S Avrunin, J Himmelstein, S K Hammond

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Healthy food procurement and nutrition standards in public facilities: evidence synthesis and consensus policy recommendations.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Healthy food procurement policies and their impact.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Comparing Strategies for Recruiting Small, Low-Wage Worksites for Community-Based Health Promotion Research.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2018
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G SorensenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA. glorian_sorensen@dfci.harvard.edu
A Stoddard
M K Hunt
J R Hebert
J K Ockene
J S Avrunin
J Himmelstein
S K Hammond

Funding

WORKSITE CANCER PREVENTION PROJECTSU01CA051686 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 1989 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA51686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed the effects of a 2-year integrated health promotion-health protection work-site intervention on changes in dietary habits and cigarette smoking.

methodsA randomized, controlled intervention study used the work site as the unit of intervention and analysis; it included 24 predominantly manufacturing work sites in Massachusetts (250-2500 workers per site). Behaviors were assessed in self-administered surveys (n = 2386; completion rates = 61% at baseline, 62% at final). Three key intervention elements targeted health behavior change: (1) joint worker-management participation in program planning and implementation, (2) consultation with management on work-site environmental changes, and (3) health education programs.

resultsSignificant differences between intervention and control work sites included reductions in the percentage of calories consumed as fat (2.3% vs 1.5% kcal) and increases in servings of fruit and vegetables (10% vs 4% increase). The intervention had a significant effect on fiber consumption among skilled and unskilled laborers. No significant effects were observed for smoking cessation.

conclusionsAlthough the size of the effects of this intervention are modest, on a populationwide basis effects of this size could have a large impact on cancer-related and coronary heart disease end points.

Indexed as

DietHealth BehaviorSmoking PreventionFemaleHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMassachusettsOccupational Health ServicesProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID9807537
PMCPMC1508574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.