ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1998
Expanding clinical applications of population pharmacodynamic modelling.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter-Based Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciclosporin in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients.Pharmaceutical research · 2019Trial
- Prediction of Busulfan Clearance by Predose Plasma Metabolomic Profiling.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Article
- Precision sirolimus dosing in children: The potential for model-informed dosing and novel drug monitoring.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Relationship between warfarin dosage and international normalized ratio: a dose-response analysis and evaluation based on multicenter data.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps.Pediatric research · 2018Review
- Theory-based pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S- and R-warfarin and effects on international normalized ratio: influence of body size, composition and genotype in cardiac surgery patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Diazoxide in Children with Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2017Article
- Role of modelling and simulation: a European regulatory perspective.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2012Review
- Understanding the time course of pharmacological effect: a PKPD approach.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Review
- Interpreting population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses - a clinical viewpoint.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Review
- Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with hepatic dysfunction treated in an oncology practice.Cancer science · 2009Article
- Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Review
- Biphasic characteristic of interactions between stiripentol and carbamazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model: a three-dimensional isobolographic analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2006Article
- Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2006Article
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling: history and perspectives.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2006Review
- Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetics.The AAPS journal · 2005Review
- Data supplementation: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic knowledge creation approach for characterizing an unexplored region of the response surface.Pharmaceutical research · 2005Article
- Pharmacokinetic considerations relating to tacrolimus dosing in the elderly.Drugs & aging · 2005Review
- Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Review
- Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics is the study of the variability in drug concentration or pharmacological effect between individuals when standard dosage regimens are administered. We provide an overview of pharmacokinetic models, pharmacodynamic models, population models and residual error models. We outline how population modelling approaches seek to explain interpatient variability with covariate analysis, and, in some approaches, to characterize the unexplained interindividual variability. The interpretation of the results of population modelling approaches is facilitated by shifting the emphasis from the perspective of the modeller to the perspective of the clinician. Both the explained and unexplained interpatient variability should be presented in terms of their impact on the dose-response relationship. Clinically relevant questions relating to the explained and unexplained variability in the population can be posed to the model, and confidence intervals can be obtained for the fraction of the population that is estimated to fall within a specific therapeutic range given a certain dosing regimen. Such forecasting can be used to develop optimal initial dosing guidelines. The development of population models (with random effects) permits the application of Bayes's formula to obtain improved estimates of an individual's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in the light of observed responses. An important challenge to clinical pharmacology is to identify the drugs that might benefit from such adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing strategies. Drugs used for life threatening diseases with a proven pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, a small therapeutic range, large interindividual variability, small interoccasion variability and severe adverse effects are likely to be good candidates. Rapidly evolving changes in health care economics and consumer expectations make it unlikely that traditional drug development approaches will succeed in the future. A shift away from the narrow focus on rejecting the null hypothesis towards a broader focus on seeking to understand the factors that influence the dose-response relationship--together with the development of the next generation of software based on population models--should permit a more efficient and rational drug development programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.