Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9797595›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood1998

A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for missing preschool booster immunisation.

M R Evans, D R Thomas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The two-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunisation schedule: factors affecting maternal intention to vaccinate.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M R EvansBro Taf Health Authority, Cathays Park, Cardiff, UK. mre@abton4.demon.co.uk
D R Thomas
Cardiff University · GBPublic Health Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify factors associated with non-uptake of preschool booster immunisation.

designData from the computerised child health system was used to study all children born in 1990 and living in South Glamorgan, Wales, on their 5th birthday. Factors associated with preschool booster uptake were investigated using multiple logistic regression.

resultsPreschool booster coverage in the study cohort was 91.4%. After adjustment for other variables, uptake was associated most strongly with completed primary immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, and polio vaccine or first dose measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Identifying children who miss either of these predicts 52.4% of those who miss the preschool booster.

conclusionEffective targeting of children who have missed previous immunisations could improve preschool booster uptake and ensure maximum uptake of at least one dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Achieving optimum measles vaccine coverage is vital to achieve the goal of measles elimination.

Indexed as

Measles VaccineMumps VaccineRubella VaccineTreatment RefusalChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccinePatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles VaccineMumps VaccineRubella VaccineVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID9797595
PMCPMC1717644
OpenAlexW2155929156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.