Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9792277›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1998

A quantitative histochemical study of alkaline phosphatase activity in isolated rat duodenal epithelial cells.

S Mozes, L Lenhardt, A Martinková

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MozesInstitute of Animal Physiology, The Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovakia.
L Lenhardt
A Martinková
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple separation method enabling the quantification of alkaline phosphatase activity in unfixed, isolated, individual, duodenal epithelial cells has been presented. The activity of intestinal brush border-bound alkaline phosphatase has been demonstrated using naphthol AS-BI phosphate as a substrate and hexazotized New Fuchsin as a simultaneous coupling agent. The amount of final reaction product, as measured cytophotometrically, increases linearly with incubation time (up to 10 min) and with substrate concentration (up to 0.4 mM). Maximum enzyme activity was obtained at pH 8.9. Variation of the substrate concentration revealed the kinetic parameters for naphthol AS-BI phosphate as Km = 0.17 i 0.015 and Vmax = 13.9 +/- 1.38. The specificity of the enzyme reaction was confirmed by the complete inhibition of the enzyme activity in the presence of L-cysteine (10 mm) and 80% inhibition with L-phenylalanine (30 mM). Comparison of alkaline phosphatase activity in 8-microm cryostat sections (beginning at the tip and proceeding to the cryptal part) along the villus axis, with the activity of individual cells obtained by successive separation, revealed similar values of the percentage quotient derived from the entire activities in these two different methods. This suggests that the presented separation procedure gives rise to isolation of the respective cells from the corresponding areas of the villus. Finally, the isolated cells can be used as a valuable tool for the quantitative analysis of alkaline phosphatase activity along the length of the villus.

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseAnimalsCell SeparationCysteineDensitometryDuodenumEnzyme InhibitorsFrozen SectionsHistocytochemistryHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntestinal MucosaMaleMicrovilliPhenylalanineRatsRats, WistarAlkaline PhosphataseCysteineEnzyme InhibitorsPhenylalanine

Identifiers

PMID9792277
OpenAlexW76458332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.