Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9788947›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Symmetry laws for interaction between helical macromolecules.

A A Kornyshev, S Leikin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The homology recognition well as an innate property of DNA structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  7. Statistical mechanics of columnar DNA assemblies.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2005
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Electrostatic interaction between helical macromolecules in dense aggregates: an impetus for DNA poly- and meso-morphism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A A KornyshevResearch Center "Jülich," D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
S Leikin
National Institutes of Health · USStadtwerke Jülich (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The power of symmetry laws is applied in many scientific areas from elementary particle physics to structural biology. The structures of many biological helices, including DNA, were resolved with the use of pertinent symmetry constraints. It was not recognized, however, that similar constraints determine cardinal features of helix-helix interactions vital for many recognition and assembly reactions in living cells. We now formulate such symmetry-determined interaction laws and apply them to explain DNA "over-winding" from 10.5 base pairs per turn in solution to 10 in hydrated fibers, counterion specificity in DNA condensation, and forces observed over the last 15 A of separation between DNA, collagen, and four-stranded guanosine helices.

Indexed as

DNAMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularStatic ElectricityDNAMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID9788947
PMCPMC1299926
OpenAlexW1967827085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.