Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9784935›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1998

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of the treatment of bacterial central nervous system infections.

R Nau, F Sörgel, H W Prange

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Presentations and Nosocomial Infections of Neurolisteriosis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Treat KPC-ProducingOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Intrathecal Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Attainment of target rifampicin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid during treatment of tuberculous meningitis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Penetration of colistin into cerebrospinal fluid.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2009
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R NauDepartment of Neurology, University of Göttingen, Germany. rnau@gwdg.de
F Sörgel
H W Prange
University of Göttingen · DEInstitute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by bacteria with reduced sensitivity to antibacterials are an increasing worldwide challenge. In successfully treating these infections the following conditions should be considered: (i) Antibacterials do not distribute homogeneously in the central nervous compartments [cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), extracellular space of the nervous tissue, intracellular space of the neurons, glial cells and leucocytes]. Even within the CSF, after intravenous administration, a ventriculo-lumbar concentration gradient is often observed. (ii) Valid parameters of drug entry into the CSF are the CSF: serum concentration ratio in steady state and the CSF: serum ratio of the area under the concentration-time curves (AUCCSF/AUCS). Frequently, the elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) in CSF is longer than t1/2 beta in serum. (iii) For most antibacterials, lipophilicity, molecular weight and serum protein binding determine the drug entry into the CSF and brain tissue. With an intact blood-CSF and blood-brain barrier, the entry of hydrophilic antibacterials (beta-lactam antibacterials, glycopeptides) into the CNS compartments is poor and increases during meningeal inflammation. More lipophilic compounds [metronidazole, quinolones, rifampicin (rifampin) and chloramphenicol] are less dependent on the function of the blood-CSF and blood-brain barrier. (iv) Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the causative organism is necessary for optimisation of treatment. (v) For rapid sterilisation of CSF, drug concentrations of at least 10 times MIC are required. The minimum CSF concentration: MIC ratio ensuring successful therapy is unknown. Strategies to achieve optimum antibacterial concentrations in the presence of minor disturbances of the blood-CSF and blood-brain barrier include, the increased use of low toxicity antibacterials (e.g., beta-lactam antibiotics), the use of moderately lipophilic compounds, and the combination of intravenous and intraventricular administration. Antibacterials which do not interfere with bacterial cell wall synthesis delay and/or decrease the liberation of proinflammatory bacterial products, delay or inhibit tumour necrosis factor release, and may reduce brain oedema in experimental meningitis. Conclusive evidence of the reduction of neuronal damage by this approach, however, is lacking.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System InfectionsCerebral VentriclesChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID9784935
OpenAlexW2127182132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.