Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9784510›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1998

New scavenger receptor-like receptors for the binding of lipopolysaccharide to liver endothelial and Kupffer cells.

M van Oosten, E van de Bilt, T J van Berkel, J Kuiper

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of a preconditioning oral nutritional supplement on pig livers after warm ischemia.HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery · 2012
    Article
  11. TLR-dependent cross talk between human Kupffer cells and NK cells.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2008
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Immunoregulation of dendritic cells.Clinical medicine & research · 2005
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M van OostenDivision of Biopharmaceutics, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Sylvius Laboratories, University of Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
E van de Bilt
T J van Berkel
J Kuiper
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is cleared from the blood mainly by the liver. The Kupffer cells are primarily responsible for this clearance; liver endothelial and parenchymal cells contribute to a lesser extent. Although several binding sites have been described, only CD14 is known to be involved in LPS signalling. Among the other LPS binding sites that have been identified are scavenger receptors. Scavenger receptor class A (SR-A) types I and II are expressed in the liver on endothelial cells and Kupffer cells, and a 95-kDa receptor, identified as macrosialin, is expressed on Kupffer cells. In this study, we examined the role of scavenger receptors in the binding of LPS by the liver in vivo and in vitro. Fucoidin, a scavenger receptor ligand, significantly reduced the clearance of 125I-LPS from the serum and decreased the liver uptake of 125I-LPS about 40%. Within the liver, the in vivo binding of 125I-LPS to Kupffer and liver endothelial cells was decreased 72 and 71%, respectively, while the binding of 125I-LPS to liver parenchymal cells increased 34% upon fucoidin preinjection. Poly(I) inhibited the binding of 125I-LPS to Kupffer and endothelial cells in vitro 73 and 78%, respectively, while poly(A) had no effect. LPS inhibited the binding of acetylated low-density lipoprotein (acLDL) to Kupffer and liver endothelial cells 40 and 55%, respectively, and the binding of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) to Kupffer and liver endothelial cells 65 and 61%, respectively. oxLDL and acLDL did not significantly inhibit the binding of LPS to these cells. We conclude that on both endothelial cells and Kupffer cells, LPS binds mainly to scavenger receptors, but SR-A and macrosialin contribute to a limited extent to the binding of LPS.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsReceptors, LipoproteinAnimalsAsialoglycoprotein ReceptorBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCD36 AntigensEndothelium, VascularHumansInjections, IntravenousIodine RadioisotopesKupffer CellsLigandsLipopolysaccharidesLiverMaleAsialoglycoprotein ReceptorCD36 AntigensfucoidanIodine RadioisotopesKupffer cell receptorLigandsLipopolysaccharidesMembrane ProteinsPolysaccharidesReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, LipoproteinReceptors, ScavengerScarb1 protein, mouseScavenger Receptors, Class AScavenger Receptors, Class B

Identifiers

PMID9784510
PMCPMC108636
OpenAlexW1833727215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.