Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9779421›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology1998

Computational methods for exon detection.

J M Claverie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dictionary-driven prokaryotic gene finding.Nucleic acids research · 2002
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J M Claveriejmc@igs.cnrs-mrs.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer methods for the complete and accurate detection of genes in vertebrate genomic sequences are still a long way to perfection. The intermediate task of identifying the coding moiety of genes (coding exons) is now reasonably well achieved using a combination of methods. After reviewing the intrinsic difficulties in interpreting vertebrate genomic sequences, this article presents the state-of-the-art, with an emphasis on similarity search methods and the resources available through Internet.

Indexed as

Computing MethodologiesDatabases, FactualExonsGenesAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceEuropeHumansInternetJapanMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Amino AcidSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidUnited StatesUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID9779421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.