ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Rationing and the health authority.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors explaining priority setting at community mental health centres: a quantitative analysis of referral assessments.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Currents in contemporary ethics. Should health care providers get treatment priority in an influenza pandemic?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2010Article
- Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?Journal of medical ethics · 2006Article
- "Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice.BMC health services research · 2005Article
- What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?BMC health services research · 2005Article
- Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.BMC health services research · 2004Article
- Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003Review
- A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003Review
- Rationing of expensive medical care in a transition country--nihil novum?Journal of medical ethics · 2002Review
- Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study.BMC health services research · 2002Article
- Resource allocation decisions in U.K. healthcare: do ethics committees have a role?HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2002Article
- Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?Journal of medical ethics · 2001Article
- Clinical ethics revisited.BMC medical ethics · 2001Article
- Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Clinical ethics committees.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Recent advances. Medical ethics.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Pandemic influenza: implications for preparation and delivery of critical care services.Journal of intensive care medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.