Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9774286›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

D-dimer testing as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. The Multicentre Italian D-dimer Ultrasound Study Investigators Group.

E Bernardi, P Prandoni, A W Lensing, G Agnelli, G Guazzaloca, G Scannapieco, F Piovella, F Verlato, C Tomasi, M Moia and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Should we diagnose and treat distal deep vein thrombosis?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role of fibrin D-dimer testing in emergency medicine.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2003
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

E BernardiIstituto di Semeiotica Medica, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
P Prandoni
A W Lensing
G Agnelli
G Guazzaloca
G Scannapieco
F Piovella
F Verlato
C Tomasi
M Moia
L Scarano
A Girolami

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of using a rapid plasma D-dimer test as an adjunct to compression ultrasound for diagnosing clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.

designD-dimer concentrations were determined in all patients with a normal ultrasonogram at presentation. Repeat ultrasonography was performed 1 week later only in patients with abnormal D-dimer test results. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Patients with normal ultrasonograms were not treated with anticoagulants and were followed for 3 months for thromboembolic complications.

settingUniversity research and affiliated centres. SUBJECTS: 946 patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.

resultsUltrasonograms were abnormal at presentation in 260 (27.5%) patients. Of the remaining 686 patients tested for D-dimer, 88 (12.8%) had abnormal concentrations. During follow up venous thromboembolic complications occurred in one of the 598 patients who were not treated with anticoagulants and who had an initial normal ultrasonogram and D-dimer concentration, whereas thromboembolic complications occurred in two of the 83 untreated patients who had abnormal D-dimer concentrations but a normal repeat ultrasonogram. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications during follow up was 0.4% (95% confidence interval 0% to 0.9%). The rapid plasma D-dimer test used as an adjunct to compression ultrasonography resulted in a reduction in the mean number of repeat ultrasound examinations and additional hospital visits from 0.7 to 0.1 per patient.

conclusionsTesting for D-dimer as an adjunct to a normal baseline ultrasound examination decreased the number of subsequent ultrasound examinations considerably without any increased risk of venous thromboembolic complications in patients not receiving anticoagulants. The use of ultrasound and testing for D-dimer enabled treatment decisions to be made at the time of presentation in most patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCohort StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecurrenceSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyVenous ThrombosisBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID9774286
PMCPMC28685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.