Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9772859›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1998

The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician?

A G Mainous, J M Gill

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations of Patient Experience in Primary Care With Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits on Isolated Islands: A Prospective Cohort Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019
    Article
  14. Continuity of Care, Follow-Up Care, and Outcomes among Breast Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A G MainousDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA. mainouag@musc.edu
J M Gill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the effect of continuity with clinicians and health care sites on likelihood of future hospitalization.

methodsDelaware Medicaid patient data were analyzed. Logistic regression models supplied adjusted effects of continuity on hospitalization.

resultsPatients in the high clinician continuity group had lower odds of hospitalization than patients in the high site/low clinician continuity group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66, 0.87). The latter group did not differ from the low site/low clinician continuity group (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.80, 1.08).

conclusionsA location providing health care without clinician continuity may not be sufficient to ensure cost-effective care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolContinuity of Patient CareDelawareFemaleHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID9772859
PMCPMC1508474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.