Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9771443›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1998

In situ localisation of Yersinia enterocolitica by catalysed reported deposition signal amplification.

P T Odinot, J F Meis, J A Hoogkamp-Korstanje, W J Melchers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P T OdinotDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J F Meis
J A Hoogkamp-Korstanje
W J Melchers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe sensitive detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in paraffin embedded tissue sections by in situ hybridisation (ISH).

methodsY enterocolitica infected cell lines, rat spleens, and patient biopsy specimens were used to compare conventional ISH, immune fluorescence assay (IFA) detection, and catalysed reporter deposition (CARD) signal amplification ISH.

resultsCARD-ISH was shown to be more sensitive then conventional ISH and had a comparable sensitivity to IFA. In contrast to IFA, CARD-ISH preserved good tissue morphology.

conclusionsCARD-ISH appeared to be a fast and sensitive ISH method for detecting Y enterocolitica in routinely processed tissue sections. Application of this method allows the combination of routine detection and cellular localisation of the pathogen within the infected tissue.

Indexed as

In Situ HybridizationAnimalsCaco-2 CellsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesRatsRats, Inbred F344Yersinia enterocoliticaYersinia Infections

Identifiers

PMID9771443
PMCPMC500747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.