Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9765158›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process.

R Klein

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.International journal of health policy and management · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2007
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2001
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent advances. Medical ethics.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R Klein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingHealth PrioritiesResource AllocationGovernmentHumansInternationalityPoliticsUnited KingdomHealth Care and Public HealthNational Health Service

Identifiers

PMID9765158
PMCPMC1114037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.