ReviewOccupational and environmental medicine1998
Comprehensive evaluation of long-term trends in occupational exposure: Part 2. Predictive models for declining exposures.
Review in Occupational and environmental medicine, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating temporal trends from occupational lead exposure data reported in the published literature using meta-regression.The Annals of occupational hygiene · 2014Pooled it
- Assessing occupational styrene exposure in the European and US Glass Reinforced Plastics Industry for the period between 1947 and 2020.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2025Article
- Cancer Incidence Among Hardmetal Production Workers: The Swedish Cohort.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
- Historical occupational trichloroethylene air concentrations based on inspection measurements from Shanghai, China.The Annals of occupational hygiene · 2015Article
- Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence.Safety and health at work · 2013Article
- Occupational cancer in Britain. Exposure assessment methodology.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Combining a job-exposure matrix with exposure measurements to assess occupational exposure to benzene in a population cohort in shanghai, china.The Annals of occupational hygiene · 2012Article
- Occupation and cancer in Britain.British journal of cancer · 2010Article
- Occupational exposure to n-hexane in Italy--analysis of a registry of biological monitoring.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2003Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of long-term trends in occupational exposure: Part 1. Description of the database.Occupational and environmental medicine · 1998Review
- Retrospective benzene exposure assessment for a multi-center case-cohort study of benzene-exposed workers in China.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the effects of various factors related to the industry, the contaminant, and the period and type of sampling on long term declining trends in occupational exposure.
methodsLinear regression analyses were used to assess the relation between reductions in exposure and geographical location, industrial sector, type of contaminant, type of monitoring, carcinogenic classification, calendar period, duration of sampling, and number of reductions in the threshold limit value during the sampling period. Both univariable and multivariable models were applied.
resultsBased on univariable analyses, the findings suggest that exposures declined more rapidly in manufacturing than in mining, more rapidly for aerosol contaminants than for vapours, and more rapidly when biological, rather than airborne, monitoring was conducted. Exposures collected more recently (first year of sampling in 1972 or later) fell more rapidly than exposures first evaluated during earlier periods. Irrespective of when the data were collected, the results also suggest that the longer the duration of sampling the slower the rate of decline. Taken together, we found that characteristics related to the contaminant, the industry, the sampling period, and the type of sampling explained a substantial proportion of the variability for exposures evaluated before 1972 (R2 = 0.78) and for sites evaluated both before and after 1972 (R2 = 0.91), but explained essentially no variation for data gathered exclusively after 1972 (R2 = 0.04).
conclusionsBy identifying factors that have affected the rates of reduction in a consistent fashion, the results should guide investigators in estimating historical levels when studies assessing exposure-response relations are carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.