Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9763649›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology1998

Damage to human muscle from eccentric exercise after training with concentric exercise.

N P Whitehead, T J Allen, D L Morgan, U Proske

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Implementing Eccentric Resistance Training-Part 2: Practical Recommendations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N P WhiteheadDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
T J Allen
D L Morgan
U Proske

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. It is known that a period of eccentric exercise provides protection against damage to muscle from subsequent eccentric exercise. Here we ask, does concentric exercise do the opposite, make muscle more prone to damage? 2. The triceps surae muscle group of one leg in each of eight human subjects was subjected to 30 min of concentric exercise per day, for 5 days. At the end of the training period there was a small but significant increase in passive torque in the exercised muscle (P < 0.05), with no changes in the untrained muscle. 3. After a single period of eccentric exercise, angle-torque curves for muscles of both legs shifted in the direction of longer muscle lengths, suggestive of an increase in series compliance. The shift in the concentrically trained muscle was significantly greater over the first 48 h post-exercise (P < 0. 05). 4. The volume of the trained leg increased significantly more than the untrained leg for five subjects over 72 h post-exercise (P < 0.05). Peak torque fell, passive stiffness increased and both muscles became sore, but with no significant differences between the two legs. 5. It is concluded that a period of concentric exercise increases the susceptibility of muscle to changes associated with the damage from eccentric exercise.

Indexed as

AdultExerciseFemaleHumansLegMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Fitness

Identifiers

PMID9763649
PMCPMC2231221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.