Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9763425›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1998

Why are two different cross-linkers necessary for actin bundle formation in vivo and what does each cross-link contribute?

L G Tilney, P S Connelly, K A Vranich, M K Shaw, G M Guild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TheFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Recapitulating Actin Module Organization in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L G TilneyDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
P S Connelly
K A Vranich
M K Shaw
G M Guild

Funding

PATTERN GENERATION OF ACTIN FILAMENTSR37GM052857 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TILNEY, LEWIS G · 1995 to 2004
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-52857NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM052857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In developing Drosophila bristles two species of cross-linker, the forked proteins and fascin, connect adjacent actin filaments into bundles. Bundles form in three phases: (a) tiny bundles appear; (b) these bundles aggregate into larger bundles; and (c) the filaments become maximally cross-linked by fascin. In mutants that completely lack forked, aggregation of the bundles does not occur so that the mature bundles consist of <50 filaments versus approximately 700 for wild type. If the forked concentration is genetically reduced to half the wild type, aggregation of the tiny bundles occurs but the filaments are poorly ordered albeit with small patches of fascin cross-linked filaments. In mutants containing an excess of forked, all the bundles tend to aggregate and the filaments are maximally crossbridged by fascin. Alternatively, if fascin is absent, phases 1 and 2 occur normally but the resultant bundles are twisted and the filaments within them are poorly ordered. By extracting fully elongated bristles with potassium iodide which removes fascin but leaves forked, the bundles change from being straight to twisted and the filaments within them become poorly ordered. From these observations we conclude that (a) forked is used early in development to aggregate the tiny bundles into larger bundles; and (b) forked facilitates fascin entry into the bundles to maximally cross-link the actin filaments into straight, compact, rigid bundles. Thus, forked aligns the filaments and then directs fascin binding so that inappropriate cross-linking does not occur.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCarrier ProteinsChromosomesCross-Linking ReagentsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleLarvaMaleMicrofilament ProteinsMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMutationPupaSensory Receptor CellsActinsCarrier ProteinsCross-Linking ReagentsfascinMicrofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9763425
PMCPMC2132811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.