Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9758291›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology1998

Trovafloxacin versus high-dose amoxicillin (1 g three times daily) in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

F Trémolières, F de Kock, N Pluck, R Daniel

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Full-course oral levofloxacin for treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Trial
  7. Safety of trovafloxacin in treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1998
    Trial
  8. Trovafloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1998
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of beta-lactam agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Review
  12. Empiric oral monotherapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: an idea whose time has come.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Article
  13. Telithromycin.Drugs · 2001
    Article
  14. Review
  15. New Fluoroquinolones: Real and Potential Roles.Current infectious disease reports · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

F TrémolièresInfectious Disease Department, Hôpital de Mantes, Mantes la Jolie, Toulouse, France.
F de Kock
N Pluck
R Daniel
Pfizer (United Kingdom) · GBBurgersdorp Provincial Hospital · ZAHôpital de La Grave · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once-daily trovafloxacin 200 mg was compared with high-dose amoxicillin, 1 g three times daily, given for 7 to 10 days. At end of treatment (day 10), the response was clinically successful (cure + improvement) in 93% of 152 clinically evaluable trovafloxacin patients and in 89% of 160 amoxicillin patients. At study end (day 35), respective rates were 91% and 81% (95% confidence interval: 1.6, 17.6; P=0.01). In evaluable patients with positive baseline radiographs, 93% of trovafloxacin and 88% of amoxicillin patients demonstrated radiological resolution at end of treatment. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae eradication rates were comparable at end of treatment in both treatment groups, but at study end Streptococcus pneumoniae eradication rates were higher in trovafloxacin patients (100% vs 81%). At study end, all four trovafloxacin patients with baseline penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were clinically cured with pathogen eradication, whereas two of five amoxicillin patients with baseline penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were clinical failures with pathogen persistence. For patients in whom no pathogen was identified, trovafloxacin was significantly more effective at end of treatment (P=0.096) and study end (P=0.013). Treatment-related adverse events were comparable; the most common were headache, vomiting and dizziness in trovafloxacin patients, and diarrhoea. headache and abdominal pain in amoxicillin patients.

Indexed as

FluoroquinolonesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmoxicillinAnti-Infective AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaphthyridinesAmoxicillinAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolonesNaphthyridinesPenicillinstrovafloxacin

Identifiers

PMID9758291
OpenAlexW2017579829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.