Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9746549›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Simultaneous measurements of actin filament turnover, filament fraction, and monomer diffusion in endothelial cells.

J L McGrath, Y Tardy, C F Dewey, J J Meister, J H Hartwig

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeting EB3-IPAmerican journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Balance of osmotic pressures determines the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic volume ratio of the cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Vimentin intermediate filaments and filamentous actin form unexpected interpenetrating networks that redefine the cell cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Profilin choreographs actin and microtubules in cells and cancer.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J L McGrathDivision of Experimental Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Y Tardy
C F Dewey
J J Meister
J H Hartwig
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

ACTIN DYNAMICS IN VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUMR01HL054145 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DEWEY, C FORBES · 1996 to 2004
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-54145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analogous techniques of photoactivation of fluorescence (PAF) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) have been applied previously to the study of actin dynamics in living cells. Traditionally, separate experiments estimate the mobility of actin monomer or the lifetime of actin filaments. A mathematical description of the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, however, predicts that the evolution of fluorescence in PAF and FRAP experiments depends simultaneously on the diffusion coefficient of actin monomer, D, the fraction of actin in filaments, FF, and the lifetime of actin filaments, tau (, Biophys. J. 69:1674-1682). Here we report the application of this mathematical model to the interpretation of PAF and FRAP experiments in subconfluent bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs). The following parameters apply for actin in the bulk cytoskeleton of subconfluent BAECs. PAF: D = 3.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-8) cm2/s, FF = 0.36 +/- 0.04, tau = 7.5 +/- 2.0 min. FRAP: D = 5.8 +/- 1.2 x 10(-8) cm2/s, FF = 0.5 +/- 0.04, tau = 4.8 +/- 0.97 min. Differences in the parameters are attributed to differences in the actin derivatives employed in the two studies and not to inherent differences in the PAF and FRAP techniques. Control experiments confirm the modeling assumption that the evolution of fluorescence is dominated by the diffusion of actin monomer, and the cyclic turnover of actin filaments, but not by filament diffusion. The work establishes the dynamic state of actin in subconfluent endothelial cells and provides an improved framework for future applications of PAF and FRAP.

Indexed as

DepsipeptidesActinsAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedCytochalasin DCytoskeletonEndothelium, VascularFluorescent DyesKineticsMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, FluorescencePeptides, CyclicPhotochemistryActinsCytochalasin DDepsipeptidesFluorescent DyesjasplakinolidePeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID9746549
PMCPMC1299879
OpenAlexW2162004920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.