Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9746548›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

How microtubules get fluorescent speckles.

C M Waterman-Storer, E D Salmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of the cytoskeleton for cancer therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Dissipation and energy propagation across scales in an active cytoskeletal material.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Profilin choreographs actin and microtubules in cells and cancer.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How we discovered fluorescent speckle microscopy.Molecular biology of the cell · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C M Waterman-StorerDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. waterman@email.unc.edu
E D Salmon

Funding

MECHANISMS OF MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTIONR37GM024364 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SALMON, EDWARD D. · 2004 to 2013
$4.1M
MECHANISMS OF MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTIONR01GM024364 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLOOM, KERRY S, SALMON, EDWARD D. · 1985 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 24364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of microtubules in living cells can be seen by fluorescence microscopy when fluorescently labeled tubulin is microinjected into cells, mixing with the cellular tubulin pool and incorporating into microtubules. The subsequent fluorescence distribution along microtubules can appear "speckled" in high-resolution images obtained with a cooled CCD camera (Waterman-Storer and Salmon, 1997. J. Cell Biol. 139:417-434). In this paper we investigate the origins of these fluorescent speckles. In vivo microtubules exhibited a random pattern of speckles for different microtubules and different regions of an individual microtubule. The speckle pattern changed only after microtubule shortening and regrowth. Microtubules assembled from mixtures of labeled and unlabeled pure tubulin in vitro also exhibited fluorescent speckles, demonstrating that cellular factors or organelles do not contribute to the speckle pattern. Speckle contrast (measured as the standard deviation of fluorescence intensity along the microtubule divided by the mean fluorescence intensity) decreased as the fraction of labeled tubulin increased, and it was not altered by the binding of purified brain microtubule-associated proteins. Computer simulation of microtubule assembly with labeled and unlabeled tubulin showed that the speckle patterns can be explained solely by the stochastic nature of tubulin dimer association with a growing end. Speckle patterns can provide fiduciary marks in the microtubule lattice for motility studies or can be used to determine the fraction of labeled tubulin microinjected into living cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryComputer SimulationDimerizationEpithelial CellsFluorescenceLungMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrotubulesModels, StructuralPhotographySalamandridaeSensitivity and SpecificityStochastic ProcessesSwineTubulinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID9746548
PMCPMC1299878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.