ArticleThe Biochemical journal1998
Transcription of the juvenile hormone esterase gene under the control of both an initiator and AT-rich motif.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Juvenile hormone action through a defined enhancer motif to modulate ecdysteroid-activation of natural core promoters.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology · 2012Article
- Regulation of the juvenile hormone esterase gene by a composite core promoter.The Biochemical journal · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The binding of transcription factors to the core promoter of the juvenile hormone esterase gene was functionally characterized using both a cell-free in vitro transcription functional assay and a cell transfection assay. A core JHE promoter (-61 to +28 bp relative to transcription start site) supported faithful transcription from the in vivo transcription start site. The nuclear extracts from the Sf9 insect cell line that provided transcription from that template also bound to that template as a probe in gel-mobility shift assays. Deletion or transversion of the initiator-binding motif (-1 to +4 bp) abolished detectable transcription either in vitro or in transfected cells. An AT-rich motif (ATATAT; -28 to -23 bp) serves another transcription factor-binding site. Mutation of the AT-rich motif to a canonical TATA-box preserved transcription, while either its deletion or complete transversion abolished or significantly reduced detectable transcriptional activity. These results indicate that, under these conditions, the functional operation of this core promoter approaches that of a composite promoter in which both the TATA- and initiator-binding protein complexes are necessary, even for basal transcription. On the other hand, these debilitating mutations to either the TATA box or initiator motif did not prevent the ability of the corresponding gel-shift competitive probes to compete with the wild-type promoter for binding by the transcription factors. Even a double transversion of both the AT-rich motif and the initiator-binding motif was able to competitively displace the protein complex that bound to the labelled wild-type probe. These data strongly indicate the presence of (an) additional core-promoter-associated transcription factor(s) (that is not the 'downstream element') that contact(s) the AT-binding complex and/or initiator-binding factor with sufficient avidity to remove them from binding to the competing wild-type promoter sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.