Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9740569›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders.

M Modell, B Wonke, E Anionwu, M Khan, S S Tai, M Lloyd, B Modell

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neonatal screening for sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parents' experiences of universal screening for haemoglobin disorders: implications for practice in a new genetics era.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Haemoglobinopathy screening: an end to institutional racism?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  12. Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a whole system participatory action research project.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M ModellRoyal Free and University College Medical School, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF. m.modell@ucl.ac.uk
B Wonke
E Anionwu
M Khan
S S Tai
M Lloyd
B Modell
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBWhittington Hospital · GBInstitute of Child Health · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the feasibility of improving screening for carriers of haemoglobin disorders in general practice by using a nurse facilitator to work with primary care teams and the relevant haematology laboratories; to identify problems in communication between all those involved in delivering the service, and to implement solutions.

designTwo year, practice based randomised controlled trial.

settingNorth London area where 29% of residents and 43% of births are in ethnic groups at risk for haemoglobin disorders. SUBJECTS: 26 of the 93 practices using the services of the area's haematology laboratory agreed to take part and were randomly divided into control and intervention practices.

main outcome measureChange in number of requests for screening tests for haemoglobin disorders made by control and intervention practices in baseline and intervention years.

resultsThe number of screening tests requested varied from 0-150 in the 93 practices in the baseline year. Study practices tended to have made a moderate number of requests (10-50) during this period. During the intervention year intervention practices made 292 more requests (99% increase) and control practices made 74 fewer requests (23% decrease; P=0.001 for difference in median change). Four practices, three of which were singlehanded, accounted for 75% of the increase. The number of requests from intervention practices, adjusted for baseline requests, was 3.2 times higher than control practices (P<0.0001).

conclusionGeneral practitioners and practice nurses are willing to undertake a new genetic screening service (or expand an existing one) if they are persuaded that it benefits the health of a significant proportion of their practice population. They need appropriate tools (for example, information materials for carriers and groups at risk), and the laboratory must be sensitive to their needs. Preconceptional carrier screening and counselling need to be coupled with antenatal screening.

Indexed as

CommunicationDiagnostic ServicesFamily PracticeGenetic Carrier ScreeningHemoglobinopathiesHumansInterprofessional RelationsLondonPatient Care TeamPrenatal DiagnosisReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID9740569
PMCPMC28672
OpenAlexW2010934118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.