Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9739504›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1998

Age-associated alterations in calcium current and its modulation in cardiac myocytes.

Y Y Zhou, E G Lakatta, R P Xiao

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Aging Heart: A Molecular and Clinical Challenge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Advances in gene-based therapy for heart failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2008
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y Y ZhouLaboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
E G Lakatta
R P Xiao
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The calcium current is one of the most important components in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. During aging, the magnitude of L-type Ca++ channel current (ICa,L) is significantly increased in parallel with the enlargement of cardiac myocytes, resulting in unaltered ICa,L density. Since the inactivation of ICa,L is slowed and the action potential duration is prolonged, the net Ca++ influx during each action potential is likely to be increased in senescent hearts relative to young ones. This augmentation of Ca++ influx may be important for the preserved cardiac function of the older heart in the basal state. However, it increases the risk of Ca++ overload and Ca(++)-dependent arrhythmias in the senescent heart. During stress, the response of ICa,L to beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation is markedly reduced, which may be an important cause of the age-related decrease in cardiac reserve function. These age-dependent changes in ICa,L and its modulations are similar to those observed in the enlarged myocytes of the hypertrophied and failing heart.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesCalcium ChannelsCardiomegalyHeart FailureHumansMiddle AgedMyocardiumPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesAdrenergic beta-AgonistsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesCalcium ChannelsPhosphoprotein Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID9739504
OpenAlexW2071194229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.